My Health Apps

We wrote about the European Directory of Health Apps on this blog back in October 2012 as we noticed what an excellent resource of health apps it was and that there was a real gap in knowledge in this area. Since then the NHS have pooled together their own, smaller collection of recommended Apps. Working at ScHARR we're very interested in the use of technologies for health care as part of our research programmes, we've even got a section who focus specifically on the topic of research into rehabilitation and assistive technologies

Web and mobile health technologies are heavily focused in the teaching carried out by members of Information Resources, especially myself, Claire Beecroft, Angie Rees and Louise Preston. So I was especially pleased to find out via a comment on our blog by Alex W that the site and Apps had been updated. I'm taking a guess that Alex W is in fact Alexandra Wyke from Patient View who oversee My Health Apps. The PDF document is now a website in its own right and can easily be browsed by one of 11 categories. Each app is recommended to the site by consumers, patients, carers, patient groups and charities. They are rated on the site with the highest rating being five hearts and the ratings explained below.

Helps you control your condition /keep you healthy 
Is trustworthy 
Is easy for you to use 
Allows you to network with people like you / who understand you 
Can be used regularly

Alex explained in her comments how the site had evolved:

1. All of the initial 307 apps appearing on the site have been selected by 456 distinct patient groups, disability groups or empowered consumers as their favourite apps. The reviews from these groups are supplied for each app, as well as weblinks to the groups themselves.

2. unique ‘heart’-rating system. The health apps on the site have been allocated ‘heart’ ratings, according to the extent that each app exhibits 5 consumer/patient needs (weighted according to level of importance). These 5 qualities are attributes that patients and the public look for from their health apps, as determined by a 2013 PatientView study of 250 patient, disability and consumer groups from 16 countries around the world. People’s requirements from health are:• Give people more control over their condition (or keep them healthy)• Easy to use• Can be used regularly• Allow networking with other people like them (or with people who understand them)• Trustworthy.

27 of the 307 health apps included in the initial version of the website gain a top ‘heart’ rating of 5 out of 5. is opening with 307 featured apps. This number will be increased every month to include other favourite apps from patient groups, disability groups or empowered consumers

Pick your own: Literature reviewing tools

I've just written article for Information Today Europe on five tools for helping you carry out a literature review and manage the multitude of references academics and students now have to juggle. Gone are the days of working in a single location, hunting down papers from journals and scribbling notes on to cigarette packets when you came across something useful.
These days students are more likely to source Tweets, videos, grey literature and Wikipedia amongst many other resources, how you save these useful bits of knowledge has become an increasing challenge; so hopefully the article and tools mention will go some way to streamlining your literature review process.

ScHARR Snack Size – Information Overload – Andy Tattersall – 12.30-1pm, Wednesday 5th March, Eric Wilkes Room

Do you feel overwhelmed and distracted by all of the emails, documents, links, Social Media updates, likes, pings, pokes, snapchats? Two things are certain, you are not alone and those distractions are not going to go away. The session will cover strategies to help you address that balance and put you back in control. 
This is the last session run by myself as I hand over control to the ScHARR Staff Development Group. It's been a great series to run over the last four years, hopefully it can go from strength to strength.

MOOCs "on trial" at the Manchester Salon

Image from Trident2000 via Wikimedia Commons

On Monday I attended a discussion and debate about MOOCs as part of the Manchester Salon at the very lovely International Anthony Burgess Foundation. The Manchester Salon is a regular discussion forum that examines a range of topical and political issues. For each discussion a panel is assembled to offer a variety of viewpoints on the issue and then the topic is opened up to the floor for discussion and debate. I was asked to attend as a member of the panel as at ScHARR we have recently run three MOOCs, the first at the University of Sheffield.

I was joined on the panel by Prof Dennis Hayes from the University of Derby, John Hutchinson, associate lecturer at the Open University and Joe Gadzula, lecturer at the University of Bolton.
The discussion was open and wide-ranging, taking in overarching issues around whether “education” can ever be delivered online, as opposed to mere “instruction”. There was also discussion about online learning and its role in contemporary higher education, with the points ranging from those who feel online learning is eroding and diminishing higher education to those who feel that it has opened up HE to a wider audience. At the end of the evening there were calls for a more precise definition of what a MOOC is (though given that there was discussion around what 'education' itself is, defining MOOCs may be neither feasible nor necessary).
The event was recorded and you can watch it at:
I enjoyed the experience and the challenge of having to think on my feet and defend the MOOC concept. I'd certainly recommend having a look at the Manchester Salon programme of events– it was an interesting evening!

ScHARR Bite Size at UCISA Conference – Changing Landscapes

This week I was lucky to attend and present at the UCISA one day conference hosted by the University of Sheffield at the excellent Edge conference centre. I didn’t know much about UCISA when I was asked to submit an abstract based on their theme Changing Landscapes back last year, and was pleasantly surprised by what an innovative and interesting conference it was and how much of it mattered to my own work.
UCISA’s aim is: “to promote excellence in the application of information systems in support of teaching, learning, research and administration in higher education.” The presentations came from a mixture of learning technologists, educationalists and IT experts and myself an information specialist.
The morning plenary was delivered by our own Dr. Christine Sexton the Director of the Corporate and Information Services based at the University. Christine’s talk looked back over the last couple of years where her team has seen rapid changes mostly thanks to Google Apps, rise of Social Media, customer demands for immediate and flexible services, security and growing appetites for wireless connectivity across a large university campus. We heard about the two little robot cleaners in the computing centre (one of them allegedly called Christine) and how even when a student cannot get an online computer game working in student halls it it treated no different from if their laptop was faulty. The ethos that the students are in our care and are our customers and therefore we have to support them quite rightly and very much heralded.  Christine touched on the Internet of Things from her use of the Nike Fuel band that talks to her scales which in time will talk to her fridge. It all makes for an exciting if not cumbersome future where we spend half of our time setting this tech up and then updating malware, but that’s a different story. Christine as ever was good value and reinforced the idea that Cloud Services are not about saving money but improving services and systems – it is a no brainer for the modern organisation.
Christine has blogged about her talk and you can read about it here.

Next up was the winning case study for the conference, Anna Armstrong from Nottingham Trent University who talked about their initiative to develop digital skills through flexible practice. The focus of talk was their work at Nottingham Trent to encourage a large group of staff to develop the digital skills and knowledge to deal with a huge number of phone calls using software to help students gain places via clearing, no small feat.

I then attended a superb presentation by Fiona MacNeill, Joyce Webber and Bethany Hewitt on their App Swap Breakfasts. This is a great idea, and felt like it had the same ethos as ScHARR Bite Size in that it is about making new technologies and ideas available that don’t eat into people’s time with a real informal fun feel about it. Their presentation was delivered on the superb nearpod app which I hadn’t seen before but will make a point of using in the future. The app allowed for voting and audience interaction via being able to draw remotely on the slides on your own tablet device whilst the presentation was happening live – I was sold on the idea and plan to try and start our own App Swap Breakfast on campus very soon.

After a lovely lunch which featured some nice cake I went to see The University of York’s presentation on their migration to Google Apps in 2012 delivered by Mike Dunn. The presentation resonated with many of the audience who too had come from organisations who had moved over to the technology giants productivity and communication suite. The University of York had first moved their students over to Google Apps before finally moving their staff over. Mike explained the many considerations the university had taken in their decision to move over, very much like Sheffield and like my own institution have not looked back since.

I then delivered my own session on ScHARR Bite Size – something visitors to this blog will be all too aware of. It was well received and and I got a few interesting questions about location, timing and how I generate new sessions. This is probably the last time I will deliver a talk about Bite Size as I hand it over to someone else after four years at the helm, it was the fourth time Bite Size had featured at a conference and was a nice way to sign the 20 minute method off. My slides from the presentation are below.

After another break where I was able to catch up with the University of Sheffield’s ex learning and teaching manager for CICS Sarah Horrigan (now at Derby University) for a chat and share some ideas about pedagogy, digital literacy and technology. After that it was back into the main conference hall to hear the final plenary from Doug Belshaw from the Mozilla Foundation talking about digital literacies delivered on the big screen via a Google Hangout. It was a great presentation, very interactive and thought provoking – Doug discussed the ideas about digital literacy spanning back to his time as a teacher, employee of JISC and through his own PhD. studies. Doug listed the eight key elements of digital literacy, that being; cultural, cognitive, constructive, communicative, confident, creative, critical and civic.
His presentation on the big screen reminded me of a scene from Big Brother, or the old Apple advert from the 1990s where a big face on the screen dictates to the nation. Except on this occasion it a good man trying to help us all understand how we can actually navigate around this massive technology and information maze better.

@dajbelshaw speaking at Changing Landscapes

I have to say my expectations were more than met by attending Changing Landscapes, I didn’t really know what to expect. What I got was a collection of brilliant presentations, lively debate and great people. I always recall speaking to Christine Sexton at the Online Information Conference in 2012 as I was about to talk about Google Apps at our University. Sadly the conference is no longer with us, and it was one of those conferences that someone in my profession gained a lot from. Christine commented that it wasn’t really her crowd (professional peer group) so to speak but that she got a lot of knowledge from being there. I think I can say the same about Changing Landscapes, despite it not being a collection of individuals I’d really come across on my various travels and networks, I did actually come away with a lot of ideas, thoughts, questions and a few connections. What more can you ask of a one day conference?